Search for: All records

Researchers have investigated whether machine learning (ML) may be able to resolve one of the most fundamental concerns in personnel selection, which is by helping reduce the subgroup differences (and resulting adverse impact) by race and gender in selection procedure scores. This article presents three such investigations. The findings show that the growing practice of making statistical adjustments to (nonlinear) ML algorithms to reduce subgroup differences must create predictive bias (differential prediction) as a mathematical certainty. This may reduce validity and inadvertently penalize high‐scoring racial minorities. Similarly, one approach that adjusts the ML input data only slightly reduces the subgroup differences but at the cost of slightly reduced model accuracy. Other emerging tactics involve weighting predictors to balance or find a compromise between the competing goals of reducing subgroup differences while maintaining validity, but they have been limited to two outcomes. The third investigation extends this to three outcomes (e.g., validity, subgroup differences, and cost) and presents an online tool. Collectively, the studies in this article illustrate that ML is unlikely to be able to resolve the issue of adverse impact, but it may assist in finding incremental improvements.

 

Open source software licenses regulate the circumstances under which software can be redistributed, reused and modified. Ensuring license compatibility and preventing license restriction conflicts among source code during software changes are the key to protect their commercial use. However, selecting the appropriate licenses for software changes requires lots of experience and manual effort that involve examining, assimilating and comparing various licenses as well as understanding their relationships with software changes. Worse still, there is no state-of-the-art methodology to provide this capability. Motivated by this observation, we propose in this paper Automatic License Prediction (ALP), a novel learning-based method and tool for predicting licenses as software changes. An extensive evaluation of ALP on predicting licenses in 700 open source projects demonstrate its effectiveness: ALP can achieve not only a high overall prediction accuracy (92.5% in micro F1 score) but also high accuracies across all license types.